supabasevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 114 268 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 520 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
supabase details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep supabase, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with