SunshinevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sunshine | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 42 741 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 265 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 86 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.1028.122642 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 84/100 for Sunshine, so it is the safer default.
Sunshine ships more often: 86 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Sunshine is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Sunshine details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Sunshine, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with