RustDesk ServervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustDesk Server | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 627 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +178 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 75/100 for RustDesk Server, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RustDesk Server.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
RustDesk Server details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep RustDesk Server, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with