Stirling-PDFvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 95 289 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 327 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with