Stirling-PDFvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 95 299 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 337 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with