statusnookvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| statusnook | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 988 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
statusnook details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep statusnook, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with