static_statusvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| static_status | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 732 | 41 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
static_status details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep static_status, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with