Standard NotesvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 | 117 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +5 608 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with