SRSvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 29 391 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with