MediaMTXvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with