SRSvsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 29 391 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →statusnook details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep statusnook, compare it with