livekitvsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →statusnook details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep statusnook, compare it with