SonarQubevsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 122 | 38 608 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +633 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+633 stars in 30 days).
SonarQube details →Trilium Notes details →