SonarQubevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 95 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 25 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
SonarQube details →Stirling-PDF details →