Apache SkyWalkingvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 | 2 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with