openobservevsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 22 562 | 24 977 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 76/100 for Apache SkyWalking, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →Apache SkyWalking details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with