Apache SkyWalkingvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with