Apache SkyWalkingvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep SyncWatch同步观影, compare it with