Apache SkyWalkingvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache SkyWalking | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Apache SkyWalking details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with