skyvernvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| skyvern | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 26 in Automation | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 23 292 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +234 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; skyvern needs more configuration.
skyvern is growing faster right now (+234 stars in 30 days).
skyvern details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep skyvern, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with