skyvernvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| skyvern | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 26 in Automation | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 23 295 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
skyvern is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).
skyvern details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep skyvern, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with