skyvernvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| skyvern | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 26 in Automation | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 23 294 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +231 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
skyvern is growing faster right now (+231 stars in 30 days).
skyvern details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep skyvern, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with