Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM)vsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 165 | 95 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM).
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with