SearXNGvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SearXNG | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 961 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
SearXNG details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep SearXNG, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with