qdrantvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 299 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →voidaccess details →