SearXNGvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SearXNG | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 38 961 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
SearXNG details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep SearXNG, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with