elasticsearchvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 78 421 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +452 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 0 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 83/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
If you want the quickest setup, Traffic Source is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+452 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with