sdnextvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with