Text Generation WebUIvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with