sdnextvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext and SonarQube score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with