InvokeAIvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 28 911 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +625 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with