Scada-LTSvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
SpacetimeDB is growing faster right now (+94 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with