EMQXvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EMQX | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 16 869 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 7 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Erlang | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
EMQX scores 78/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.
EMQX details →SpacetimeDB details →