sandboxed.shvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sandboxed.sh | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
sandboxed.sh details →Tube Archivist details →