sandboxed.shvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sandboxed.sh | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 676 | 38 608 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +633 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 14 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+633 stars in 30 days).
sandboxed.sh details →Trilium Notes details →