ryotvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 649 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 33 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+198 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with