ryotvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 64/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with