ryotvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with