ryotvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 650 | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 64/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with