SparkyFitnessvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 6 498 | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with