ryotvsTile38
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Tile38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 9 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tile38 scores 66/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Tile38 details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Tile38, compare it with