RustFSvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 35 508 | 53 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | +322 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with