RustFSvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 35 504 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 772 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with