automqvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
automq scores 68/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
automq is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
automq details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with