RustFSvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 35 507 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 675 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 675 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with