OpenMediaVaultvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenMediaVault | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 7 042 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenMediaVault scores 72/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenMediaVault.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; OpenMediaVault needs more configuration.
OpenMediaVault is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
OpenMediaVault details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenMediaVault, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with