RustFSvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 35 504 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 772 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with