glusterfsvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
glusterfs and Urbit score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
glusterfs is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with