RustFSvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with