glusterfsvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
glusterfs details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with